<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>My Ramblings on Open Source BI</title>
		<description>Comments for My Ramblings on Open Source BI at http://www2.nextanalytics.com , comment 1 to 1 out of 1 comments</description>
		<link>http://www2.nextanalytics.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 22:49:51 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Commercial open source</title>
			<link>http://www2.nextanalytics.com/nextanalyticsBlog/BusinessAnalytics/My-Ramblings-on-Open-Source-BI.html#comment-23</link>
			<description>Ward, I'm glad to see you're still plugging along.  What drove me to your site, actually, is your pending Kognitio announcement, but being here I'll comment --

There is such a thing as free, commercial open source, in the form of robust community editions from companies that include, in the BI/DW realm, the ones I cited in my article (which I'll note was written to Information Week style): Pentaho, JasperSoft, Engineering (SpagoBI), Jedox (Palo), Actuate (Eclipse BIRT), Talend, EnterpriseDB (PostgresPlus), InfoBright, MonetDB, LucidDB, and surely others that I'm not thinking of right off.  Free, as in &quot;free beer,&quot; but not always as in &quot;free speech&quot; given that non-sponsor developers aren't welcome to contribute to some of these projects.  You even have projects like the Mondrian ROLAP server where one company is paying the majority of the development costs and other, competing companies freely use the software.

I don't see this situation -- that you CAN do high-end BI with 100% free, commercially backed open-source software (a.k.a. commercial open source) -- any time soon.

Seth - SethGrimes</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:13:23 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
